~ lemarc Honing and fiercely fighting for your (but as it IS in all: to different extents, so_ (OUR) religious asses. (Neither atheist nor otha) lemarc___2012
Monday, March 19, 2012
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Authors Efforts To Qualify and Quantify their NON Problems With Past Religious Upbringing: Speak As It Was.
---too many extraordinary writers that are etc: Try to show their objectivity with (never had a problem with religion when (I) was growing up) ---
While I do understand this (I feel I must call it a ploy), but noble if you like, I think they risk albeit it does need to be approached this way: the chance that they will have lost a segment of their readers.
I will take that side ---In Prep room (H). coming...
While I do understand this (I feel I must call it a ploy), but noble if you like, I think they risk albeit it does need to be approached this way: the chance that they will have lost a segment of their readers.
I will take that side ---In Prep room (H). coming...
NO! Gaps Bigger Than The Space Time Continuum Between Their Teeth? AND: Worthy Of A Look?
---Say it (IS)n't so. It (Ought) not to be. SHarris and myself share one thing for sure. Ok. 2.
The first is he is very silly looking: But more to the main point: I do think we tend to get much too caught up in our own still littered -but very lovely- language and put enormous energy in holding to a principle, or maxim etc that, while it might be very well, needed and once and still had a key factor in pushing things forward -at that time I stress, which still even at worst is not even compatable with simply quoting a book a sad sack gave you (like the drinker that will use his last dollar to ensure you drink with him) so as not to be alone-thus the only one with a problem to drown, we too can make this a pool of a type of dogma. Release the hounds of basking in a Euro or for that matter, ANY foreign, therefore cyrptic words---An easy but 1st class example ---"to thyne own self be true" ---SHUTUP!
Think and speak your mind as open and honest as possible--Not as mysterious, but more clear.
Here: Basically we already know. What? Well, we know our own pretty laws of science break down at certain points: <---call it the crux. We are in danger of ourselves being cruxified on the language if we keep ringing the bell for beauty, certainly the femanine version of beauty: As in mysterious.
I will publish as is: It's a sunny day_I need to work on my tan for my job as lifeguard at the ...pending.
The first is he is very silly looking: But more to the main point: I do think we tend to get much too caught up in our own still littered -but very lovely- language and put enormous energy in holding to a principle, or maxim etc that, while it might be very well, needed and once and still had a key factor in pushing things forward -at that time I stress, which still even at worst is not even compatable with simply quoting a book a sad sack gave you (like the drinker that will use his last dollar to ensure you drink with him) so as not to be alone-thus the only one with a problem to drown, we too can make this a pool of a type of dogma. Release the hounds of basking in a Euro or for that matter, ANY foreign, therefore cyrptic words---An easy but 1st class example ---"to thyne own self be true" ---SHUTUP!
Think and speak your mind as open and honest as possible--Not as mysterious, but more clear.
Here: Basically we already know. What? Well, we know our own pretty laws of science break down at certain points: <---call it the crux. We are in danger of ourselves being cruxified on the language if we keep ringing the bell for beauty, certainly the femanine version of beauty: As in mysterious.
I will publish as is: It's a sunny day_I need to work on my tan for my job as lifeguard at the ...pending.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)